UK’s DARE, Belgium’s Royal Academy of Medicine and Switzerland Government’s Health Technology Assessment Report 2011 rejected Shang 2005 Lancet study on Homeopathy https://twitter.com/i/events/783637460890689537
The first paper in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology can be accessed at http://web.archive.org/web/20190220011104/https://www.anthromed.org/UploadedDocuments/LuedtkeRuttenJCE08.pdf
Two recent and related papers, published in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology and Homeopathy (the journal of the Faculty of Homeopathy, the UK’s professional organisation of medically qualified homeopaths), have reconstructed the analysis carried out by the authors of The Lancet’s much vaunted 2005 meta-analysis, on the back of which the journal triumphantly editorialised “the end of homeopathy”, and have placed on record the fact that the study was hugely flawed and in some instances just plain incorrect.
These papers emphatically underline the position this blog has taken from the outset — that the underlying data does not support the assertion that homeopathy is no more than placebo. The jury is still out, and those that claim otherwise are misrepresenting their personal opinion as proven scientific fact when it’s nothing of the kind.
View original post 1,068 more words